Slovenia is a net importer of food, as domestic production does not cover the total domestic needs (especially for vegetables, fruit, potatoes and pig meat). The long-term trend indicates that the self-sufficiency rate is higher and more stable for animal products (milk, eggs, beef and poultry meat), except for pig meat and honey, where the self-sufficiency rate is noticeably decreasing. In the analysed period, surpluses occurred only in the domestic production of milk, beef, poultry meat, in some years in eggs and honey, and in recent years in the production of grain maize. Meanwhile, the self-sufficiency in crops is generally lower and varies from year to year (influence of harvests). In the long term, only the self-sufficiency rate for cereals is increasing, including barley, rye and grain maize, while the self-sufficiency rate for wheat shows a slightly downward trend.
The self-sufficiency rate is defined as the extent to which a country’s domestic production is able to meet the total domestic demand (including food, feed, and industrial consumption). A self-sufficiency rate of less than 100% means a deficit that must be covered by imports, and a self-sufficiency rate of more than 100% means a surplus in domestic supply.
The indicator shows the level of self-sufficiency for the following agricultural products in Slovenia: meat, by main types and total, eggs, potatoes, cereals, by main types and total, vegetables, fruit, milk, and honey. Self-sufficiency rates are shown only at the level of individual agricultural products, but not at the aggregated food level. Available quantities of agricultural products for human consumption per capita and a comparison of self-sufficiency rates for cereals between Slovenia and some countries are also presented.
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
* temporary data
| Meat, total[%] | Eggs[%] | Cereals[%] | Potatoes[%] | Vegetables[%] | Fruit[%] | Milk, total[%] | Honey[%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 92 | 95 | 48 | 83 | 47 | 66 | 113 | 112 |
| 2001 | 100 | 98 | 46 | 79 | 39 | 55 | 117 | 105 |
| 2002 | 97 | 97 | 63 | 85 | 42 | 59 | 115 | 105 |
| 2003 | 97 | 104 | 38 | 64 | 37 | 56 | 116 | 97 |
| 2004 | 92 | 103 | 63 | 86 | 43 | 58 | 114 | 102 |
| 2005 | 88 | 94 | 60 | 74 | 45 | 49 | 113 | 75 |
| 2006 | 88 | 97 | 50 | 60 | 39 | 52 | 120 | 81 |
| 2007 | 93 | 95 | 54 | 70 | 34 | 49 | 120 | 78 |
| 2008 | 91 | 95 | 64 | 57 | 36 | 38 | 115 | 81 |
| 2009 | 83 | 93 | 57 | 63 | 37 | 38 | 114 | 85 |
| 2010 | 84 | 93 | 57 | 63 | 30 | 47 | 116 | 74 |
| 2011 | 85 | 96 | 71 | 63 | 37 | 46 | 120 | 85 |
| 2012 | 83 | 92 | 70 | 55 | 34 | 37 | 117 | 51 |
| 2013 | 82 | 91 | 55 | 46 | 33 | 43 | 118 | 82 |
| 2014 | 80 | 90 | 77 | 67 | 38 | 42 | 120 | 20 |
| 2015 | 74 | 93 | 72 | 59 | 40 | 47 | 125 | 71 |
| 2016 | 76 | 95 | 74 | 55 | 42 | 32 | 132 | 59 |
| 2017 | 81 | 90 | 63 | 50 | 38 | 15 | 134 | 45 |
| 2018 | 81 | 96 | 69 | 48 | 41 | 47 | 129 | 79 |
| 2019 | 81 | 95 | 75 | 47 | 43 | 30 | 127 | 44 |
| 2020 | 83 | 95 | 88 | 60 | 48 | 36 | 133 | 67 |
| 2021 | 85 | 97 | 84 | 44 | 43 | 14 | 135 | 15 |
| 2022 | 86 | 94 | 72 | 36 | 39 | 29 | 134 | 90 |
| 2023 | 83 | 95 | 79 | 38 | 33 | 16 | 131 | 13 |
| 2024* | 79 | 87 | 81 | 41 | 37 | 27 | 129 | 51 |
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
*Temporary data
| Wheat[%] | Barley[%] | Rye[%] | Maize[%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 63 | 30 | 7 | 48 |
| 2001 | 58 | 33 | 18 | 45 |
| 2002 | 63 | 34 | 17 | 75 |
| 2003 | 47 | 24 | 21 | 38 |
| 2004 | 54 | 45 | 42 | 77 |
| 2005 | 48 | 51 | 36 | 72 |
| 2006 | 44 | 45 | 17 | 57 |
| 2007 | 47 | 53 | 22 | 58 |
| 2008 | 55 | 57 | 19 | 72 |
| 2009 | 48 | 53 | 22 | 63 |
| 2010 | 49 | 54 | 31 | 61 |
| 2011 | 55 | 68 | 43 | 82 |
| 2012 | 65 | 81 | 50 | 72 |
| 2013 | 47 | 62 | 75 | 58 |
| 2014 | 59 | 72 | 73 | 91 |
| 2015 | 52 | 73 | 61 | 87 |
| 2016 | 52 | 74 | 47 | 92 |
| 2017 | 46 | 74 | 61 | 72 |
| 2018 | 41 | 68 | 60 | 89 |
| 2019 | 47 | 74 | 83 | 96 |
| 2020 | 57 | 83 | 76 | 114 |
| 2021 | 57 | 74 | 57 | 109 |
| 2022 | 51 | 79 | 81 | 87 |
| 2023 | 50 | 71 | 83 | 106 |
| 2024* | 54 | 76 | 91 | 103 |
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
*Temporary data
| Beef and veal[%] | Pigmeat[%] | Poultrymeat[%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 96 | 77 | 110 |
| 2001 | 119 | 81 | 113 |
| 2002 | 117 | 78 | 110 |
| 2003 | 107 | 86 | 114 |
| 2004 | 96 | 80 | 115 |
| 2005 | 93 | 70 | 112 |
| 2006 | 101 | 70 | 108 |
| 2007 | 101 | 74 | 114 |
| 2008 | 103 | 70 | 113 |
| 2009 | 98 | 55 | 109 |
| 2010 | 106 | 52 | 112 |
| 2011 | 110 | 50 | 113 |
| 2012 | 112 | 46 | 109 |
| 2013 | 107 | 40 | 117 |
| 2014 | 106 | 39 | 111 |
| 2015 | 99 | 35 | 103 |
| 2016 | 108 | 34 | 107 |
| 2017 | 110 | 38 | 109 |
| 2018 | 109 | 38 | 109 |
| 2019 | 103 | 40 | 111 |
| 2020 | 107 | 40 | 111 |
| 2021 | 111 | 43 | 112 |
| 2022 | 116 | 41 | 108 |
| 2023 | 106 | 37 | 109 |
| 2024* | 98 | 35 | 107 |
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
*Temporary data
| Meat, total (carcass weight equivalent)[kg] | Eggs[kg] | Cereals[kg] | Potatoes[kg] | Vegetables[kg] | Fruit[kg] | Milk, total (raw milk equivalent)[kg] | Honey[kg] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 88.50 | 10.80 | 129.80 | 90.20 | 78.50 | 104.50 | 233.20 | 1 |
| 2001 | 93 | 10.10 | 135.20 | 79.60 | 73.40 | 79.10 | 227.90 | 1.20 |
| 2002 | 88 | 9.60 | 126.20 | 79.80 | 78.70 | 114.90 | 234.60 | 1.20 |
| 2003 | 99.20 | 6.90 | 123.60 | 72.50 | 81.50 | 100.10 | 228.70 | 1 |
| 2004 | 98.60 | 6.20 | 119.50 | 75.80 | 89 | 128.30 | 235.80 | 1.20 |
| 2005 | 97.30 | 6.50 | 124 | 76.80 | 91.30 | 125.10 | 235.30 | 1.10 |
| 2006 | 94.20 | 7 | 125.50 | 78.90 | 95.60 | 124.40 | 218.90 | 1.40 |
| 2007 | 94.70 | 8.90 | 123.90 | 81.40 | 90.30 | 131.70 | 223.60 | 0.90 |
| 2008 | 96.60 | 10 | 119.20 | 77.50 | 101 | 151.70 | 234 | 1 |
| 2009 | 94.10 | 10.20 | 108.70 | 72 | 103.20 | 148.50 | 230 | 1.10 |
| 2010 | 93.70 | 10.20 | 121.10 | 70.30 | 91.80 | 135.20 | 223.70 | 1.10 |
| 2011 | 89.50 | 10.10 | 118.10 | 66.40 | 97.10 | 129.30 | 218.90 | 1.40 |
| 2012 | 88.20 | 9.10 | 115.40 | 63.30 | 95.30 | 113 | 225.90 | 1 |
| 2013 | 82.20 | 10.30 | 112.30 | 59.40 | 98.30 | 129.40 | 218.60 | 1.40 |
| 2014 | 85 | 9.80 | 119.30 | 62.40 | 103.90 | 131.10 | 219.90 | 1.10 |
| 2015 | 88.30 | 11.10 | 120.90 | 68.30 | 109.90 | 134.20 | 218.70 | 1.40 |
| 2016 | 94.20 | 10.70 | 121.40 | 68.50 | 113.40 | 122.70 | 213.20 | 1.10 |
| 2017 | 93.10 | 11.50 | 121 | 68 | 114 | 121.60 | 209.90 | 0.90 |
| 2018 | 92.60 | 10.90 | 123.30 | 66.50 | 111.40 | 152.50 | 215.50 | 1.10 |
| 2019 | 90.80 | 11.70 | 120.40 | 62 | 117.50 | 127.90 | 214 | 0.70 |
| 2020 | 87.70 | 10.40 | 116.30 | 63.70 | 118.90 | 128.90 | 206 | 0.90 |
| 2021 | 89 | 10.80 | 116.60 | 63.20 | 118.50 | 108.70 | 206.10 | 0.60 |
| 2022 | 87.10 | 11 | 115.70 | 71.60 | 104.30 | 133.60 | 204.50 | 1.30 |
| 2023 | 86.90 | 11.10 | 112.20 | 77.60 | 100.90 | 129.80 | 201.50 | 1 |
| 2024* | 91.30 | 11 | 113 | 78.40 | 103.50 | 143 | 206 | 1 |
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
*Temporary data
| Wheat[kg] | Barley[kg] | Rye[kg] | Maize[kg] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 101 | 2.10 | 5.60 | 19.10 |
| 2001 | 111 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 20.60 |
| 2002 | 103.40 | 0.70 | 1.20 | 19.10 |
| 2003 | 100 | 0.50 | 2.80 | 18.10 |
| 2004 | 97.10 | 0.60 | 2.80 | 16.60 |
| 2005 | 100.10 | 0.60 | 4.30 | 15.80 |
| 2006 | 101.90 | 0.60 | 4.90 | 15 |
| 2007 | 97.60 | 0.90 | 4.40 | 17.70 |
| 2008 | 94.60 | 0.60 | 4.40 | 16.40 |
| 2009 | 86 | 0.70 | 4.40 | 15.30 |
| 2010 | 100.40 | 0.80 | 3.80 | 13.40 |
| 2011 | 97.70 | 0.80 | 3 | 14.20 |
| 2012 | 95.30 | 0.70 | 2.80 | 14.20 |
| 2013 | 92.50 | 0.70 | 2.90 | 13.30 |
| 2014 | 102 | 0.80 | 3.70 | 9.20 |
| 2015 | 103.20 | 0.80 | 2.70 | 10.40 |
| 2016 | 103 | 0.80 | 2.90 | 11.40 |
| 2017 | 101.30 | 0.70 | 2.90 | 11.40 |
| 2018 | 103.80 | 0.90 | 3.20 | 11.30 |
| 2019 | 100.60 | 0.90 | 2.30 | 13.10 |
| 2020 | 98.80 | 0.90 | 1.50 | 11.50 |
| 2021 | 100.60 | 1 | 1.20 | 9.90 |
| 2022 | 100.60 | 1.10 | 1.20 | 9 |
| 2023 | 98.10 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 8.90 |
| 2024* | 97.10 | 1 | 0.90 | 9.30 |
SORS, 2025; calculations AIS
*Temporary data
| Beef and veal[kg] | Pigmeat[kg] | Poultrymeat[kg] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 20.60 | 38.10 | 24.80 |
| 2001 | 20.20 | 41.30 | 26.10 |
| 2002 | 19.20 | 39.90 | 24.10 |
| 2003 | 23.60 | 42.40 | 24.90 |
| 2004 | 23.40 | 44.60 | 23.10 |
| 2005 | 23.60 | 44.20 | 24.70 |
| 2006 | 20.70 | 45.20 | 23 |
| 2007 | 21.10 | 42.10 | 26.10 |
| 2008 | 21.30 | 43.20 | 26.70 |
| 2009 | 20.50 | 40.50 | 28.10 |
| 2010 | 19.90 | 41.60 | 27.70 |
| 2011 | 19.80 | 39.60 | 26.20 |
| 2012 | 18.90 | 37.70 | 27.70 |
| 2013 | 18.60 | 35.50 | 24.80 |
| 2014 | 18.10 | 36.80 | 27 |
| 2015 | 19 | 37 | 28.90 |
| 2016 | 20 | 40.80 | 30 |
| 2017 | 20.80 | 37.60 | 31.10 |
| 2018 | 19.80 | 37.90 | 31.20 |
| 2019 | 20.10 | 36.50 | 30.60 |
| 2020 | 19.60 | 32.70 | 31.50 |
| 2021 | 20.60 | 32.80 | 30.90 |
| 2022 | 20.20 | 30 | 32.40 |
| 2023 | 19.70 | 30 | 33.20 |
| 2024* | 20.60 | 31.80 | 34.90 |
Eurostat, 2025; calculations AIS
| 2022[%] | 2023[%] | |
|---|---|---|
| Lithuania | 374 | 423 |
| Bulgaria | 278 | 291 |
| Latvia | 348 | 290 |
| Romania | 166 | 242 |
| Estonia | 286 | 226 |
| Slovakia | 153 | 196 |
| Hungary | 106 | 185 |
| Poland | 146 | 174 |
| Croatia | 194 | 153 |
| Türkiye | 92 | 112 |
| Germany | 110 | 106 |
| SLOVENIA | 75 | 87 |
| Finland | 124 | 81 |
| Greece | 67 | 71 |
| Italy | 46 | 47 |
| Ireland | 51 | 42 |
| Portugal | 18 | 18 |
Ensuring food security and the highest possible level of self-sufficiency is the first goal of Slovenian agricultural policy, as stated in the Agriculture Act. According to the Strategic plan on implementing the resolution on strategic guidelines for agricultural and food industry development by 2020, increasing the level of self-sufficiency by year 2020 was set as a general goal for the following agricultural products and product groups: wheat, fodder grains, pulses, oilseeds, potatoes, vegetables (fresh and processed), pig meat, cheese, cottage cheese and honey. Only two goals were defined more specifically, namely:
The current strategic guidelines do not include specific goals for increasing food self-sufficiency in Slovenia. The 2023–2027 Strategic Plan and the Resolution "Our food, rural areas and natural resources after 2021" only emphasize achieving and maintaining an adequate level of food self-sufficiency and ensuring food security through the stable production of safe, high-quality and consumer-accessible food.
Countries can achieve food security through two mechanisms: self-sufficiency or imports. Self-sufficiency indicates the extent to which the country is able to provide the necessary quantities of food through domestic production. This is very important in ensuring the availability of food to the population, especially in conditions of disrupted international trade and strong price fluctuations in foreign markets. Self-sufficiency presents not only the basis for food security, but also allows the use of own production resources, maintains rural employment and cultivation, reduces poverty, and is important for human health and the environment. A higher level of self-sufficiency reduces the need for food imports, which contributes to the reduction in emissions due to shorter transport distances (Revizijsko …, 2021).
Slovenia is among the countries that are net importers of food, as domestic production does not fully cover the total domestic needs. The level of self-sufficiency for animal products is generally higher than the level of self-sufficiency for crops, while the lowest levels are on average recorded for vegetables, fruit, potatoes and pig meat. Self-sufficiency rates in crop production are characterized by significant year-to-year fluctuations due to more or less abundant harvests (total amount of crops), which are also strongly influenced by extreme weather conditions, such as drought, frost, etc. (Zeleno ..., 2022). Global megatrends show that the increasingly variable climate in the future may negatively affect food production in terms of quantity and quality, thereby increasing Slovenia's dependence on the world markets (Sadauskis et al., 2019).
Self-sufficiency rates, as well as per capita available quantities of agricultural products in Slovenia are compared between the period before EU accession (2000–2003), the post-accession period (2004–2019) and the most recent years (2020–2024). Prior to EU accession, Slovenia was on average self-sufficient in milk and honey, and almost completely self-sufficient in eggs and meat. Of the individual types of meat, self-sufficiency was achieved in beef and poultry meat, while the self-sufficiency rate of pig meat was 81%. Average self-sufficiency in potatoes was also high (78%), while for other agricultural products like cereals, vegetables and fruit it did not exceed 60%. In the post-accession period (2004–2019), the self-sufficiency rate of meat, potatoes, fruit and honey decreased more noticeably. In the case of potatoes and fruit, the reason is in reduced production volumes and extreme weather conditions, while self-sufficiency in meat was lower due to the significant decline in pig meat production. The latter declined due to slow structural changes, weak competitiveness, and pressure on prices (cheaper imports of foreign pig meat). A year after accession to the EU, a reform of the EU sugar market was adopted, which led to the closure of the sugar factory in Slovenia. Before the adoption of reform, the self-sufficiency rate for sugar beet averaged 50%. Since 2017, sugar beet has been grown again on a smaller scale, and the harvest is exported abroad for processing. In recent years (2020–2024), Slovenia had on average surpluses in milk (132%), poultry meat (109 %), beef (108 %), and grain maize production (104 %). A high level of self-sufficiency was on average also achieved in eggs (94%). The largest deficit in production, which had to be covered by imports, was in fruit (average self-sufficiency: 24%), vegetables (40%), potatoes (44%), pig meat (39%) and honey (47%). Compared to the pre-accession period (2000–2003), the level of self-sufficiency has decreased significantly in recent years for meat, potatoes, fruit and honey. Self-sufficiency in honey (–58%) and pig meat (–41%) has decreased the most, while it has remained at similar levels for vegetables, beef, poultry meat and eggs. Only for cereals (+32%) and milk (+17%), the level of self-sufficiency was significantly higher. In the case of cereals, an upward trend can be observed throughout the analysed period for all the main types (rye, barley and maize), except for wheat.
A comparison of self-sufficiency rates for cereals between Slovenia and the 15 European Union member states and Turkey shows large differences between countries. In 2023, the highest self-sufficiency rates were achieved in the Baltic states: Lithuania (423%), Latvia (290%) and Estonia (226%), and in Bulgaria (291%) and Romania (242%). Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Croatia, Turkey and Germany were also self-sufficient. Among the analysed countries, Slovenia ranked in the bottom third (12th place) in terms of self-sufficiency in cereals (self-sufficiency rate 87%). Lower self-sufficiency levels than in Slovenia were in 2023 in Finland (81%), Greece (71%), Italy (47%), Ireland (42%) and Portugal (18%).
Like the self-sufficiency rates, the available quantities of agricultural products for human consumption in Slovenia fluctuate from year to year. The upward trend is the most evident for vegetables, as in the period of the last few years (2020–2024), compared to the pre-accession period (2000–2003), available quantities per capita increased by 40%, namely from 78 to 109 kg. The available quantities of fruit (+29%; to 129 kg per capita) and eggs (+16%; to 11 kg per capita) also increased. On the other hand, the available quantities of potatoes decreased the most in relative terms (–12%; from 81 to 71 kg per capita), while they decreased for milk the most in absolute terms. In the period of the last few years, each inhabitant of Slovenia had on average 205 kg of milk available in all forms, which is 26 kg less than in the pre-accession period. The available quantities of cereals for food are also decreasing, amounting to an average of 115 kg per capita, which is 14 kg less than in the pre-accession period. Average available quantities of meat for human consumption have decreased slightly between the two analysed periods (–4%; to 88 kg per capita), mainly due to smaller quantities of pig meat. On the other hand, available quantities of poultry meat have shown an increasing trend, averaging about 33 kg per capita in recent years.
The presented data on self-sufficiency show that Slovenia has not met the goals set in the Strategic plan on implementing the resolution on strategic guidelines for agricultural and food industry development by 2020. The self-sufficiency rate for vegetables in the recent period averages 40% and has not exceeded the 50% threshold, while the self-sufficiency rate for pig meat has remained at an average of 39%, far below the target level of 70%.
Slovenia faces many challenges in achieving an adequate level of food self-sufficiency, such as lower productivity of agricultural sector, poor income levels of farms, an aging rural population, abandonment of farming, overgrowth and permanent loss of agricultural land, a high share of areas with natural constraints for agriculture, as well as climate and environmental challenges. For the country's self-sufficiency, it will be crucial to preserve the extent of agricultural land and its production potential, improve the income situation of farms, as well as invest in agricultural infrastructure and adapt to climate change. The main agricultural policy instruments for achieving these goals are income support for farmers (including young farmers) and payments for natural or other constraints (Poročilo ..., 2023).
Poročilo o strateškem načrtu SKP za leto 2021. 2023. Ljubljana, Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano.
https://skp.si/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Strateski-nacrt-SKP-2023-2027-2.-sprememba-1.pdf
Revizijsko poročilo: Zagotavljanje prehranske varnosti s pomočjo prehranske samooskrbe. 2021. Ljubljana, Računsko sodišče Republike Slovenije.
https://www.rs-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/Datoteke/Revizije/2021/Samooskrba/Samooskrba_RSP_RevizijskoP.pdf (21.9.2025)
Sadauskis R., Kolarič Š., White O. 2019. Vpliv globalnih megatrendov na stanje okolja v Sloveniji: Sklepne ugotovitve in priporočila. Bernard Vukadin (ur.). Ljubljana, Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor – Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje: 92 str.
https://eionet.arso.gov.si/media/1890 (19.10.2025)
Zeleno poročilo za leto 2024. 2025. Travnikar T. (ured.), Bedrač M., Bele S., Bleiweis A., Brečko J., Dvoršak H. A., Kožar M., Moljk B., Pucihar Š., Zagorc B. Poročilo o stanju kmetijstva, živilstva, gozdarstva in ribištva v letu 2024. Ljubljana, Kmetijski inštitut Slovenije. https://www.kis.si/f/docs/Porocila_o_stanju_v_kmetijstvu/ZP_2024_splosno__priloge_1.pdf (26.10.2025)