The share of agricultural land with high natural value has not changed significantly since 2018.
Slovenia is characterized by significant landscape diversity primarily resulting from its rugged terrain, diverse climatic conditions, soil types, land use, and a fragmented ownership structure. The agricultural landscape exhibits exceptional diversity in its coverage. In flat areas, this diversity is mainly due to a pronounced fragmented ownership structure and soil types (e.g., dry and sandy soils on gravel and sand, and hydromorphic soils on clays and loams) with occasional natural landscape features (hedges, shrublands, wetlands, small water bodies, etc.). In the hilly and mountainous regions, landscape diversity is further contributed to by relief factors, geomorphology, natural landscape features, and human-made structures (hedges, dry stone walls, etc.).
Compared to other EU countries, Slovenia demonstrates substantial landscape diversity and a high natural value of its agricultural land.
In this indicator, we address the proportion of areas with high natural value from two different perspectives. By examining this indicator, we present a share of HNV land in 38 European countries, and at the same time we track changes in the proportion of high natural value areas at the national level. In both cases, the focus is on agricultural land.
The indicator represents and assesses the proportion of agricultural land with high natural value. It thereby indicates the extent to which agricultural land is diverse in terms of the diversity of land use and mosaic coverage of agricultural land. In the first part (KM05-1), it shows the proportion of agricultural land with high natural value (HNV) in Slovenia and compares it with the proportion of HNV agricultural land in other EU countries based on uniform Corine Land Cover data at a scale of 1:100,000. In the second part (KM05-2), it monitors changes in the proportions of land use with characteristics of high natural value based on detailed national data at a larger scale (1:5,000) from the RABA database (MKGP).
SOURCE: MAFF, 2002-2024; calculations by AIS
* 1222 (Extensive orchard), 1321 (Marsh meadow), 1410 (Agricultural land in overgrowth), 1500 (Trees and shrubs), 1800 (Agricultural land, growing with forest trees)
| Sum of the agricultural land use areas of high natural value (HNV)*[ha] | Share of HNV areas use of total agricultural land[%] | Share of HNV areas use of total land in Slovenia[%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 67092.25 | 10.12 | 3.31 |
| 2005 | 69525.98 | 10.72 | 3.43 |
| 2007 | 75082.75 | 11.26 | 3.71 |
| 2011 | 83031.49 | 12.44 | 4.08 |
| 2018 | 103894.82 | 15.41 | 5.12 |
| 2019 | 105519.22 | 15.66 | 5.20 |
| 2020 | 104365.66 | 15.55 | 5.15 |
| 2022 | 102718.70 | 15.33 | 5.06 |
| 2024 | 101911.89 | 15.30 | 5 |
SOURCE: EEA, 2018; calculations AIS
| Complex cultivation patterns (CLC 242)[%] | Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation (CLC 243)[%] | Share of land area with high natural value (CLC 242 + 243)[%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iceland | 0.05 | 0 | 0.05 |
| Germany | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.44 |
| Sweden | 0.28 | 1.31 | 1.59 |
| Liechtenstein | 2.75 | 0.46 | 3.22 |
| Finland | 0.03 | 3.28 | 3.31 |
| Norway | 0.49 | 2.93 | 3.42 |
| Switzerland | 2.51 | 1.81 | 4.32 |
| Hungary | 2.82 | 2.05 | 4.87 |
| Poland | 2.65 | 3.90 | 6.54 |
| Spain | 3.81 | 2.94 | 6.75 |
| Austria | 4.37 | 2.72 | 7.09 |
| Ukraine | 3.26 | 3.95 | 7.22 |
| Romania | 3.50 | 3.85 | 7.35 |
| Ireland | 0.83 | 6.92 | 7.75 |
| Slovakia | 1.31 | 7.36 | 8.67 |
| Czechia | 0.60 | 9.04 | 9.64 |
| Estonia | 3.07 | 6.70 | 9.76 |
| Denmark | 2.27 | 8.19 | 10.45 |
| Latvia | 6.47 | 4.49 | 10.97 |
| Moldova | 5.20 | 6.61 | 11.81 |
| Cyprus | 7.15 | 4.71 | 11.86 |
| Bulgaria | 2.36 | 9.56 | 11.92 |
| France | 10.18 | 2.83 | 13.00 |
| Montenegro | 2.10 | 11.74 | 13.84 |
| Greece | 5.20 | 8.67 | 13.87 |
| Italy | 7.29 | 7.14 | 14.43 |
| Turkey | 5.42 | 9.15 | 14.58 |
| Albania | 6.80 | 8.65 | 15.45 |
| Portugal | 7.08 | 8.52 | 15.60 |
| North Macedonia | 8.64 | 7.26 | 15.90 |
| Lithuania | 9.71 | 7.09 | 16.80 |
| Netherlands | 14.05 | 3.34 | 17.39 |
| Luxembourg | 13.47 | 5.83 | 19.30 |
| Slovenia | 12.81 | 9.07 | 21.88 |
| Croatia | 13.69 | 8.94 | 22.63 |
| Belgium | 17.35 | 6.12 | 23.47 |
| Serbia | 12.59 | 12.08 | 24.67 |
| Malta | 3.99 | 45.55 | 49.53 |
The share of agricultural land (AL) in Slovenia has changed only minimally, from 32.7% in 2002 to 32.9% in 2024. At the national level, we annually monitor land use changes in significantly finer detail (1:5,000). Among the 20 land use categories, five are considered HNV: 1222 (Extensive orchards), 1321 (Wet meadows), 1410 (Agricultural land undergoing afforestation), 1500 (Trees and shrubs), and 1800 (Agricultural land overgrown with forest trees).
The combined share of these five categories increased from 10.1% in 2002 to 15.3% in 2024 (101,912 ha). Between 2018 and 2024, the shares fluctuated only slightly, between 15.7% (2019) and 15.3% (2024). These changes are small, within a few tenths of a percent, and mainly reflect the subjectivity of photo interpretation. Compared to the previous report, which covered data up to 2022, the values remain practically unchanged – confirming the absence of a clear trend of increase or decrease in the proportion of HNV land uses.
Monitoring the proportion of HNV areas at the EU level
At the EU level, the proportion of HNV areas in agricultural land, expressed as the sum of CLC categories 242 - Complex cultivation patterns and 243 - Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation is 21.9%. It is worth noting that even a significant share of contiguous agricultural land, such as class 211 – non-irrigated arable land, also reflects the diversity of the fragmented ownership structure. With this share, Slovenia ranks 4th among EU countries and 5th among 38 European countries. When considering only category 243 – Agricultural land with a significant proportion of natural vegetation – Slovenia ranks 3rd in the EU (after Malta and Bulgaria). We can conclude that an exceptionally large share of Slovenia’s agricultural land demonstrates high natural value, measured with a uniform methodology and in comparable time periods.
Hočevar M., Kobler A., Vrščaj B., Poljak M., Kušar G. 2001. Corine karta rabe tal in pokrovnost Slovenije. Ljubljana, Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije
Updated CLC illustrated nomenclature guidelines. 2019. 2019. izd. European Environmental Agency
MKGP. Raba kmetijskih zemljišč Republike Slovenije 1:5.000 [Land use digital database (1:5.000) ] verzija 2011 do verzije leta 2024.
MKGP/MAFF. 2013. Interpretacijski ključ; podroben opis metodologije zajema dejanske rabe kmetijskih in gozdnih zemljišč. Ljubljana, Slovenija Slovenia], MKGP.
Stritar A. 1990. Krajina in krajinski sistemi. Raba in varsto tal v Sloveniji. [Landscape and Landscape Systems. Soil Use and Conservation in Slovenia]. Ljubljana, Slovenia [Slovenia], Partizanska knjiga:
Oset F. 1987. Kategorije, talni tipi, bonitetni razredi, raba tal in velikost parcel na posameznih pedosekvencah v Savinjski dolini. Diplomska naloga / Diploma thesis, Ljubljana, Slovenija, Univerza Edvarda Kardelja v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, VTOZD za agronomijo / University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Agronomy Department: 129 p.