KAZALCI OKOLJA

Key message
Bad

Subsidies that are contrary to achieving the goal of reducing GHG emissions do not decrease over the years. The value of the indicator is inconsistent with the long-term objective of the OP GHG: "graduated but significant reduction of the environmentally harmful subsidies". In comparison with the previous year, the harmful subsidies in 2017 rose again, and they are rapidly approaching the point where they were the highest. Excise duties on diesel fuel stand out the most and they increased for 7 % compared to the previous year. As subsidies drive consumers to higher GHG emissions, additional measures are needed to achieve a target reduction in GHG emissions, as if they were without these subsidies. Additional measures are usually also more expensive.


Charts

Figure PO24-1: Subsidies in the period 2005−2017, which are contrary to the objectives of reducing GHG emissions
Show data
Environmentally harmful subsidies
2005 77.39
2006 73.95
2007 82.34
2008 80.61
2009 107.29
2010 136.78
2011 105.02
2012 103.26
2013 115.18
2014 118.29
2015 116.75
2016 123.65
2017 135.23
Figure PO24-2: Structure of granted subsidies that are in contrast to achieving GHG emission goals (Source: JSI-EEC)

Methodology

Date of data source summarization